Improvements: learning from losses

It was my last match of the season last night, so I thought I would show a loss of mine from earlier this season to demonstrate how to learn from your losses. It was generously written up in Downend’s match report as both players ‘taking risks’ but really it was me getting thrown in the opening and subsequently trodden down – lots of lessons learnt from my imaginary GM coach…

Why look at losses? Why not chuck the score-sheet in the bin?

Well – you can chuck them away if you want. I’m pretty sure we all play this game for fun – even if it is slightly masochistic fun at times. But I guess the point of looking back through painful losses depends on whether you see fun and improvement as dependent on each other (or at least natural co-habitors), or you see improvement as an optional thing which doesn’t impact on fun. Either is okay, but if you fit the former right now, critiquing your own play is among the best ways to improve. So do it.

The GM coach on your shoulder

I am going to analyse this game using this technique – imagining a GM peering at your moves and telling you what they think – honestly – about your moves. Clearly I don’t need my coach to be as good as a GM, but I find it easier to imagine a GM being ruthlessly honest about each move – Gordon Ramsey style if need be. So, here we go.

Mike Harris vs Chirag Hosdurga (Horfield B vs. Downend B – 23/10/18)

Full game re-playable here: https://www.downendchess.com/game/1106

Opening: A Sicilian with an early Qb6 – and White trying to play like Karpov with Be2 and Nf3-d4-b3… but Black equalises easily.

1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Qb6 5. Nb3 Nf6 6. Nc3 e6 7. Be3 Qc7 8. Be2 a6 9. a4 Bb4 10. f3 d5

pos1

So Black gets in that key Sicilian move d5 with no issues. Something clearly went wrong – I ‘learnt’ this Nb3 idea from a book about Karpov called ‘Slay the Sicilian’, with some beautiful games by the world champ. Over to the coach:

GM coach: “Mike, you are not Karpov. He won a lot of games with Nb3 which you admire, but here’s the thing – he is a better chess player and more importantly he is a very different player to you. He wins games dictating positional subtleties from a distance – whereas you win most games with a sledgehammer. D5 is the key move for Black – and preventing it is an art, you do it sometimes with tactics and sometimes with strategy. But you don’t just let it happen and hope for the best… Yes, you may have won a few decent games which included the move Nb3, but it’s more of a coincidence – this system is not for you. Stop playing it.”

Me: Harsh. But true. And I will. Promise. Okay, on with the game:

Early middlegame: White’s h-pawn is under fire and the kingside lacks pieces. White tries to hold the pawn by threatening a bishop-trap – which fails.

11. O-O Bd6 12. exd5 Nxd5 13. Nxd5 exd5

pos2

GM coach: “Hmm.. I thought the point of Nb3 was to direct attention to the queenside, where you can make use of your control of it from the two bishops and your a4 prod. Now look at it! The knight and the pawn on a4 look quite useless – and the attention is all on the kingside. Again, this is why you prevent d5 – the centre stays closed then.

Okay, so we’re in a mess, let’s try to get out. First off, watch out for your h-pawn. You know the one protecting your king – it’s important… No, the opposing bishop will not be trapped on h2. It’s about the least trapped bishop ever. Just defend it or move it and move on – chess is a long game, you will get some chances again.”

Me: Yup. Sound advice. But that seems like too much effort, maybe I’ll just spend three moves not defending my h-pawn:

14. Kh1 O-O 15. Qd2 Re8 16. c3 Bxh2

pos6

GM coach: “(sigh) Ok, that’s bad. c3 was a waste – I know you were worried about the move d4, but trust me, you have bigger things to worry about. The h-file is now open for the queen or a rook.

But not to worry – try something else and then complicate things. Try to stay positive and look for your strengths in the position, there is still that isolated d-pawn… its not much but its something. Just don’t panic and play anything totally anti-positional like f4.”

17. f4

GM coach: “(winces) Oh dear oh dear. What was that? Do you still think you are trapping that bishop? You are now completely lost and you should resign.”

Me: Yeah… I’ll take my chances.

Mid-Middlegame: Black builds up more of an attack with the strong bishop on g3 while White has to deal awkwardly with a few attacks such as Qh6, threatening Qh2 – very difficult to stop.

17… Bg3 18. Kg1 Bf5 19. Nd4 Nxd4 20. Bxd4 Qd6

pos4

GM coach: “It’s still over – resign.”

Me: Okay, I’ll just try some random moves first.

21. Rf3 Qg6 22. Raf1 Be4 23. Re3 Bxf4

pos5

GM coach: “…”

24. Rxe4 Bxd2 25. Rg4 Rxe2 0-1

Me: Okay I resign.

Footnote

Very well played to my opponent in this game – who took advantage of the above mistakes with great efficiency.

Silver lining

So, what’s the point of analysing losses? Well, fairly serendipitously I played another game about a month later – and won by snapping up an a-pawn with a bishop, recognising that trapping the bishop was harder than it looked, and in fact it because a nuisance for my opponent and I ended up with an ending of 5 pawns vs. a lone bishop.

The rewards for studying losses will not always come this quickly – but we should recognise that there are many lessons from one game – like me and my attachment to the Nb3 move in the Sicilian. If you blundered in a game then it’s unlikely that was the only lesson there, or that the blunder came about all of a sudden. Look at the lead up to the blunder – what were your thinking patterns? What didn’t you understand about the position?

Sharing games on BCT and elsewhere

I am publishing this game for two related reasons:

  • To encourage others to analyse their losses
  • To encourage others to share their games to help others learn.

We have always asserted that in amateur chess we should all be sharing games (yes – including those cherished opening secrets) if we want to improve. After all, we are not grandmasters preparing novelties on move 27 for the upcoming world champs. We are all chess players on the same path – and looking honestly at our own mistakes must be the truest way to improve.

So share your games. It could be with a friend or clubmate, with your whole team (at Horfield there are frequently email threads going round discussing the match gone by) or on the internet for all to see.

As far as BCT goes, we will not continue just with our own games – that might get a bit repetitive. So without more contributions, we will eventually stop. If you want to see a friendly culture of improvement, then be the change that you want to see!

If you would like to take up the challenge of finding your worst game of the season – or any game you can learn from – email us at bristolchesstimes@gmail.com


mikecircle

Mike is a regular league player and co-editor of the Bristol Chess Times

Ratings – possible issues with monthly grading

Quick league update – congratulations to North Bristol CC for the div 2 title! Now for something completely different – some thoughts about grading:

I read with interest Bob Radford’s and the BCT’s comments on the ECF’s proposals for using FIDE ratings. It’s handy to have a quick conversion check list and it’s interesting to see the BCT’s questions about the conversion process. To quote them: “Here at the BCT we are quite confused about all this K-factor and RO and algorithms going on”

But I see from the link to the ECF proposals that these are headed “Monthly grading proposal” and the change from ECF to ELO is a secondary detail to facilitate the introduction of monthly grading. The change to monthly grading seems to be a done deal, while the switch from ECF to ELO is a supplementary matter which is explained (or not, depending on your point of view!) in great detail. So, really, there are two separate issues: monthly grading and the switch to ELO.

I suspect that the introduction of monthly grading has rather gone under the radar and in fact opens an enormous can of worms. There is a major issue concerning how monthly league results would be communicated to the ECF. At present the results are sent twice-yearly and the increase in administrative hassle to do it monthly must be a major concern. I don’t want our league’s administrators to be caught up with feeding monthly data to the ECF if this will in any way affect the excellent reporting of results that we currently enjoy. Chessit reporting is actually quite sophisticated in the way that it handles not only match scores and updating of tables but also detailed club statistics including grading thresholds and play ups and downs. We are extremely lucky to have all this.

It is all very well for the ECF to lay down that results must be sent in monthly but I seriously wonder whether they have really thought it through properly and understand the problems they may be causing bigger leagues like ours. They state in their proposal that “At least in the early stages, there should be tolerance of delayed reporting, particularly for leagues and internal club results.” I wonder if this could be the thin end of the wedge.

As regards how monthly grading will affect the individual player, I suspect that anyone who is desperate to know how his/her grade is progressing from game to game is able to do this quite easily on the back of an envelope or, if they are so inclined, on a simple computer spreadsheet. And indeed they probably already do! How many will feel the necessity to log on to an ECF file to see their monthly grade? Nice to have, maybe, but hardly essential for most players. We have around 320 players in the league, of whom typically 60-ish play in weekend congresses which means that over 70% only ever play league chess for grading purposes. They can already see their grade not monthly, but weekly, on Chessit, so the ECF’s publishing of monthly updates will add nothing of great value for them.  And, after all, “they”, the silent majority, are the League.

I am fairly sure that we all play league chess for the enjoyment, fun and competitive spirit that the league gives us. And I suggest we look out for the results and league tables on Chessit in much the same way that we check the football results in the Sunday paper or on the internet. I would not want that to be put at risk because of issues to do with sending results to the ECF.

Perhaps it will be argued that monthly grading can be implemented with no adverse effect on Chessit. However, until I see convincing proof of that, I shall remain very cautious about the potential administrative problems. If push came to shove and the ECF were to try to force the League to send monthly results against our better judgement, I would hope we would have the determination to stand up to them. Incidentally, these are all purely my personal views.

And my personal view on changing from ECF to ELO is that I suppose it is “progress” and I can’t get too excited about it one way or the other. Of greater concern seems to me to be how the webmasters will cope with it.

BCT: If anyone else has any thoughts about current proposals, or proposals of their own around grading, please comment and share them with the league. Many thanks to Ian for his.


Author:  Ian Pickup is a regular Bristol League player in division 1

BCT Archives: September 1993

Originally a bi-monthly publication in the 80’s and 90’s the Bristol Chess Times delivered the latest league updates and news in a pre-Internet era. Here is another BCT from September 1993 when Michael Hennigan won the British Championships!

This issue features a report of the British Chess Championship won by Michael Hennigan – once a Bristol University Student. Fun fact – he is the only champion in the last 35 years not to have a Wikipedia entry… so if anyone out there is in the know please submit one!

Another baffling story is that of current Division 1 logger-heads Bath and Clifton got themselves into a total mess with a player forgetting to seal their move in the cup final – the whole match rested on how this incident was judged. Read more in the PDF below – and for those who aren’t old enough to remember sealed moves, read all about that here.

Open the PDFhere: BCTsep93


john

John has been playing for Horfield for longer than anyone else cares to remember (but was actually 1983). Never quite managing to get to a 180 grade, he is resigned to the fact that he probably never will. He set up the original Bristol League website and has been, at various times League General Secretary, Recruitment and Publicity, Chess Times Editor, Bristol 4NCL Manager and an ECF Arbiter.

Cross Hands Blitz – all hands on deck

The Cross Hands pub in Downend has been putting on great blitz nights for 5 months – the next is on the 3rd March and it needs new players!

Note – well done to all winners and the 141 entrants of the 72nd Bristol League Championships! Now for some Blitz!

12 rounds of quality blitz chess on a Sunday night with a 10% discount at the bar – this is what is on offer the first Sunday of every month at the Cross Hands pub. Always great fun, you’ll get to practice those offbeat openings, win prizes (and frequently, get the chance to play IM Jim Sherwin – the first opponent in Fischer’s 60 memorable games, no less).

Downend residents (and players) Derek and Elmira run this tournament with FIDE arbiter Geoff Gammon – and have been fronting the prizes in months when numbers were low. So we are giving them a big shout out to get some new players out on a Sunday to support Bristol Blitz – and hopefully this event will become a mainstay of the tournament calendar.

blitz

Put it in the diary, tell everyone you know about it, offer lifts, and scrub up on those tactics!


mikecircle

Mike is co-editor of the Bristol Chess Times and plays regular league and tournament chess

Problems in February with GM Jones

GM Jones is back with another edition of chess problems – this time the theme is ‘distant self-blocks’ of all things!

Having last time presented a problem that I had managed to solve, this time I’m presenting one that I failed to solve when I recently came across it. Having said that, I then was kicking myself for my laziness (I’d only spent about five minutes looking for the solution) because it shouldn’t have been too difficult to find the key move and thereafter to have the pleasure of unearthing and admiring the continuations after Black’s various defences.

game1
White to play and mate in 3

This problem, by the late Friedrich Chlubna, won first prize in Problem in 1968. It is a 3-mover: White is to play and is to force mate on his third move at the latest.

As usual. the key is not a checking move, nor is it crude in any way. But looking at crude moves may help in arriving at the solution, because some of them will work if we can first induce Black to make a move that will work to his disadvantage.

The key is 1.Rg6!. This threatens 2.Qg4+ Kxe5 3.Qe4. Black has a number of defences – 1…Rg2 is met by 2.Rf6+ Kg3 3.Rf3, 1…Rf2 by 2.Qg5+ Kf3 3.Qg4, 1…Qd4 by 2.Qg4+ Kxe5 3.Qg5, 1…d5 by 2.Qg4+ Kxe5 3.Re6, and 1…e2 by 2.Qg5+ Kf3 3.Qg3.

The remarkable thing is that each of these defences features what a problemist would call a ‘distant self-block’: Black puts his piece on a square to which his King could otherwise move out of check. What’s more, these ‘self-blocks’ are distant: they are on squares to which the King is not yet adjacent, but rather on squares to which he will become adjacent. To show this in five continuations is a remarkable task achievement and (unlike some task achievements) an aesthetically appealing one.

The place where I saw this problem was the website of the British Chess Problem Society, and there are countless other similarly enjoyable problems there. On the homepage you’ll find a weekly problem selected by Michael McDowell. For many years he’s been selecting weekly problems for the website, and he chooses them with a solver’s as much as a composer’s eye. (He’s very good at both those activities!) At the foot of the homepage, beneath the problem, you’ll find a link to the archive of these weekly problems, so you will be able to spend as long as you like solving old weekly problems (or even, like me, rushing all too quickly to read the solution!).

Check out some past problems from Chris here:

November 2018

August 2018

July 2018

 


chriscircle

Chris is a GM problem composer and long-time member of the Bristol League

A wild game from the major cup quarters

No doubt this one goes down in Downend’s Hall of Fame – Michael ‘Tal’ Meadows pulls off an enterprising win in the cup

Sitting in a cricket club in December staring at zero winning opportunities whilst your team slowly get outplayed on all boards is no fun for a captain looking for his club’s only chance of sliverware. But sadly that’s where I was.

But the stresses of amateur captaincy melted away when, peeking to my left, I witnessed some wild and mysterious chess on the board next to me. It was none other than Meadows vs. Nendick – and is surely a contender for game of the season:

The Magician from Riga, Mikhail Tal, had a knack of landing in an endgame just one point of material ahead after a mind-boggling middlegame with several sacrifices. That’s what Mike achieved here, and the queen was simply dominant over the two rooks.

Here are some of Phil’s thoughts as it happened:

phil1
After 12. Bg5

Phil (black): “This got me out of book (!) so I spent quite a while trying to refute it. As it happens Fischer has played it so it’s probably not too bad.

After a6 and Ba4: The knight can now be embarrassed in some lines with Bd7 as it is now pinned to the bishop but I couldn’t make the tactics work. I decided instead for active defense.”

phil2
After 14. Bxf6

Phil: “I had initially planned 14…o-o the point being that White now has 2 pieces en prise so I’ll get one of them and I’ve got my king relatively safe. The problem is he can open it up with Bxg7.”

BCT: Phil played hxg3 instead

phil3
After 17…Qxf6

“This time 0-0 works well and maintains a healthy advantage”

BCT: Alas Phil grabbed the bishop and got his king in no-mans land (of course White’s king is in such a traditional place!)

phil4
After 20… Qxf7

Phil: “I thought this was pretty much forced as Qxe4 is coming with my king stuck in the middle but Qd6 again seems to hold the balance (if you’re a computer)”

phil5
After 24…Kxf6

Phil: “I thought I would try and make something of my kingside majority but hanging on to the queenside and hoping for a draw would probably have been more prudent”

BCT: It was very tough to defend after this because the rooks had no active plans, any attempt to move them up the board falls to nasty queen-checks. It was all lost at this point and I could tell Mike was much more comfortable. A great win and an overwhelming performance from the Downend team.

Why not send us your games? We’ll edit them how you want and show them off to the world!


 

mikecircle

Mike is co-editor of the Bristol Chess Times and plays regular league and tournament chess 

UK Blitz Final (Dec 1st) – and interview with qualifier Fiona Steil-Antoni

We caught up with WIM and popular chess broadcaster Fiona Steil-Antoni and talked about chess in the modern world.

Last month I participated in the Bristol qualifier of the UK Open Blitz tournament, and came agonisingly close to the top two qualifying spots (around joint 13th… ahem).

However, I had the dubious honour of getting mated-in-one against Fiona Steil-Antoni, whose interview with us is below. Alice Lampard from Bristol Uni also qualified for the final – after a notable draw against me in which we both blundered queens – and is the only Bristol League representative (GM Nick Pert and Krystof Sneiberg also made it; full list below).

UK Blitz
The participants for December 1st in Birmingham

Interview

BCT: Thanks for speaking with us – and for choosing Bristol! How’s it going?

Fiona: Great thanks; I had a last-minute decision of which qualifier to go to, I’m glad I chose Bristol!

BCT: I saw you recently played a game for North Bristol as well – how did that come about?

Fiona: Yes I had a tough game against an FM [Tyson Mordue – he annotates the game here]. I had met a player from North Bristol at a weekender in Dublin; and they invited me to play so I said sure! Glad to get my debut here, shame it was a loss..

BCT: Best of luck next time! So you are quite a personality on the chess scene – seems like there has been lots of great stuff in professional chess recently – what’s your view on it all?

Fiona: It’s all great – streaming has been such a big improvement, people are enjoying watching chess online – and it is a big range of grades as well. It is something for everyone, and its enjoyable – really makes chess fun and accessible.

BCT: Are there any specifically you have enjoyed?

Fiona: Some really successful ones like ‘My Teacher Sam’, and the ChessBrahs come to mind, but there are many others. The Pro-Chess League has been particularly fun – obviously I have been involved in the broadcast of it for a while but there are others showing it as well. You get a team of 4 players and they could be a big range of grades. If you’re drawn against a big team you could end up playing one of the best – even Hikaru or Magnus – so it’s really exciting and players are getting their bit of fame so that was great to be a part of. Of course Ginger GM as well!

BCT: Of course. Do you think all this online growth is helping chess in general?

Fiona: It is growing definitely – the general public know more now. Magnus has done extremely well as world champion, it definitely helps that he is young, and attractive – I think chess today has a way to go to match the hype that it had in the 70’s, but its different now and who knows where it will go. All the online platforms have done a great job.

Thinking about today – faster games are good to increase viewers; at the final one thing I hope is that they get digital boards [DGT boards can relay the moves played]; it’s like 8 boards in each section, so 16 digital boards needed to enable everyone to watch the games live – seems like an easy way to make it much more exciting and attract viewers.

BCT: Yes let’s talk about today – who was your toughest opponent so far?

Fiona: Nick. [GM Pert – just the 400 rating points clear of the field]

BCT: Ah, of course. Second?

Fiona: Hmm. Hard to say – also can’t remember the names! [We hadn’t played our match at this point, but safe to say it wasn’t me].

BCT: You’re in pole position right now for the women’s final, so assuming you make it, who are you looking out for at the finals?

Fiona: Lots of great players I expect will be there, but Sophie Milliet (France) is very original and has been having good results, she will be very tough.

BCT: Again the very best of luck for that! One last thing – you’ve been following the Bristol Chess Times a little – what advice can you give us?

Fiona: Vlogging is very effective. Blogs are great but videos are just easier and people like to see behind the scenes nowadays. It’s also more instant, more present. Keep the blog going – that’s great too, but it’s mostly about streaming and vlogging now.

[Well Fiona, we took your advice and have done what we can – starting a YouTube channel – if we get the time then we’ll start vlogging too!]

BCT: Great, thanks – well I’ll let you actually take a break and recharge before the last 5 rounds!

Fiona: My pleasure, best of luck yourself

[I needed it. I’ll be back next year for what was a pretty intense and fun day, and will try to avoid mates in one, queen-blundering, and failing to convert games a rook up. Meanwhile I’ll be relaxing and watching the final]

Congratulations also to Bristolian Tom Thorpe who ran the qualifying event – he has since been awarded the title of FIDE International Arbiter!


 

mikecircle

Mike is co-editor of the Bristol Chess Times and plays regular league and tournament chess

Game of the Month – October 2018

We check in on the league and get started for a brand new season of Game of the Month.

The league is in full swing!

Division One proving as tough as ever and a little surprising; Downend B are on top thanks to a youthful and in-form team. Bath A are lurking with a match in hand and look very strong, for example only losing 2.5 points to all 3 Horfield teams put together!

Conversely to division 1, the ‘A’ teams are in charge of the other three divisions: North Bristol, Cabot, and Harambee with a much improved start compared to last season in division 4 (they have a game in hand over Clevedon C, level on points).

Game of the Month

Rob Attar vs. Max Walker

Horfield B vs Clevedon A (division 1)

I was playing in this match, and would have shown my own loss on board 1, succumbing to some nice tactics from my opponent, but there was a sharper game on board 4 from Max:

1. d4 Nf6 2. Nf3 e6 3. Bf4 b6 4. e3 Nc6 5. Bd3 Be7 6. O-O Nb4

pos1
With Nb4, Max removes the ‘London Bishop’

7. c4 Nxd3 8. Qxd3 Bb7 9. Nbd2 O-O 10. e4 d5 11. cxd5 exd5 12. e5 Ne4 13. Rac1 c5 14. b3

pos2
Here Max goes for cramping the other bishop with g5!

14… g5 15. Bg3 g4 16. Ne1 cxd4 17. Qxd4 Bc5 18. Qd3 Ba6

pos3
Ba6! A nice tactical idea with the plan of Nxd2, trapping the rook on f1.

The engines prefer Qg5, which is always hanging in the air – but perhaps this is more a computer favourite because it shuts out a few perpetual possibilities for White. But if one thing is certain, Rob wasn’t looking for chances to bail out! With the g-pawn gone, this is still a very double-edged position.

Rob accepts the exchange loss and sets about creating counter-chances against the open king, but Max finds a cool defence:

19. Qxa6 Nxd2 20. Qe2 Nxf1 21. Qxg4+ Kh8 22. Kxf1 Rg8 23. Qf3 Qd7 24. Bh4 Be7

pos4
Be7(!) defends f6 but leaves a tempting Qxf7

And Rob takes the bait with Qxf7! This is a piece sacrifice, with the idea being that after Black escapes the pin with Qb5+ and then Bxh4, White has the nasty Rc7! Threatening h7 mate with no obvious escape.

But Max had seen one:

25. Qxf7 Qb5+ 26. Kg1 Bxh4 27. Rc7

pos5
Black has one defence to Qxf7…

27… Bxf2+! And Black either drags the king to an unfortunate square (If Kh1, Qf1 mate; and if Kxf2, Rf8 pins and wins) or distracts the White queen away from mate so that Black can bring in the reinforcements in time. Phew!

28. Qxf2 Raf8 29. Nf3 Qd3 30. Ne1 Rxf2 31. Nxd3 Rgxg2+ 32. Kh1 Rxh2+ 33.
Kg1 Rxa2 34. e6 Rhd2 35. Ne1 Rd1 36. Kf1 Raa1 37. Kf2 Rxe1 38. e7 Kg8
0-1 (Full game below)

Well played to Max and to Clevedon A who won that match and are definitely in the running for division 1. See you next time and remember to keep sending in those games!


 

mikecircle

Mike is co-editor of The Bristol Chess Times and plays regular league and tournament chess

Horfield win over ‘Rest of league’ in 75th anniversary celebration

Founded by air-raid wardens in 1942 and still going strong – strong enough to beat the rest of the league in their anniversary match!

Miraculously or not, two even-handed teams of 11 chess warriors rocked up for battle on Saturday morning, supplied with coffee, cake and biscuits and 45 minutes on the clock. It was Horfield’s 75th – playing against a mixed team representing 7 different league clubs. The captains were Bristol league legends John and John (Richards and Curtis), organised and arbitrated by yours truly.

round2
The top boards in round 2

A history of the club (also found on Horfield’s website) was on display, along with famous games past and present.

history
A long history

The pleasant and spacious playing hall was just upstairs from the usual dinky Horfield rooms – unfortunately reserved for Pilates on Tuesday evenings.

room
Plenty of mental gymnastics going on in the fitness room

Geoff Gammon got to play instead of arbitrate, and brought along a number of puzzles to add to the collection – one of the beauties is below:

puzzle.jpg
White to play and win (solution at the end of this article)

Though a friendly match, chess players are always up for a fight and Horfield will be rejoicing at the convincing scoreline, 15 – 7! Only two players won both their games – Derek Pugh and Phil Nendick of Horfield A.

result
Horfield won 7-4 with all players playing Black, and bettered that by 1 in round two with the White pieces to total 15-7

Memorabilia was also on display – including the charming ‘h-file’ leaflet/magazine:

hfile
Classic photos from yonderyear

Thanks to Horfield for putting on a friendly event for the league, and to all those who travelled to play and show support for a long-standing club.

In other news

I couldn’t stand to organise chess and not play for much longer, so I saddled on down to the Cross-Hands pub for some blitz on the Sunday night.

Through a combination of dubious sacrifices, grovelling for draws against people half my age, winning on time whilst literally getting checkmated and all-around time-scrappery, I managed to win a tournament outright for the first time in at least 5 years. So thanks to Downend, Derek and Elmira for organising and Geoff for arbitrating.

Come along next time on December 2nd (especially if you live in Downend – no excuse really!) Details will be on Downend’s website.

Puzzle Solution

After the ridiculous Kg5!! Black has a couple of waiting moves (c5 is met with d5!, and f4 is met with f3!) before fatal zugzwang, where the Black queen is lost with every move.


 

mikecircle

Mike is co-editor of the Bristol Chess Times, is now a feared blitz superstar across the land, and plays regular league and tournament chess

The November Problem with GM Jones

I think that chess problem solving tournaments can be quite fun, although it must be admitted that I say this from the perspective of someone who is usually involved in helping to run them, not actually competing!

Part of the skill in running such a competition is in selecting problems of the right level of difficulty. On August 26th I ran the problem solving event at the MindSports Olympiad in London. Only five competitors turned up, but they all took the event seriously, and as lively discussions broke out at the end of each round about problems they’d solved correctly and problems they hadn’t I think they found it a stimulating experience. All five were more familiar with chess-playing events, though some had at least a passing interest in problems. The event took the form of two one-hour ‘papers’, each comprising six problems, nearly all of them orthodox, and as the scores, out of 60, ranged from 47.5 to 14.5 I was pleased that no competitor found the problems either too easy or hopelessly difficult.

Of the problems, my own favourite, which was solved I think by two of the five competitors, was one that I managed to solve when looking for problems to set:

Screen Shot 2018-11-01 at 14.59.58

It’s mate in 4. Composed by one Walter I. Kennard, it was published in American Chess Bulletin in 1915.

Solution Below

In this case, Black has only two legal moves, so the obvious approach to solving is to see what happens if White ‘passes’ and Black plays either of these moves. Well, White isn’t worried about 1…c5. This move, losing control over d5, allows 2.Rd1 b5 3.Rd5 and 4.Rxc5#. But as matters stand White doesn’t have a mate after 1…b5; the only way then in which you might hope to mate within the 4-move time-frame is 2.c5, but then after 2…b4 what happens? If 3.cxb4+ Kb5 and there is no mate.

But of course it is White to play in the initial position, and can we finagle it so that in that line there is a mate after 3…Kb5? If so, the mate would have to be 4.c4. So the Rook must guard c4. The natural way to do this is to play 1.Rf4 – but the drawback then is that 1…c5 now defends successfully! (If 2.Rd4 then of course 2…cxd4.) So the ‘lightbulb moment’ is when one sees that the key has to be 1.Rc1! It is very attractive that this move, which of all the moves on the board seems to give the Rook the least influence, does have the well-concealed potential to guard the c2P when it administers mate on move 4. And of course the Rook at c1 can still play the mating line, beginning 2.Rd1, if Black plays 1…c5.

Screen Shot 2018-11-01 at 15.04.02

Mate in four after: 1.Rc1 b5 2.c5 b4 3. cxb4 + kb5 4. c4# (editors note – Lovely stuff!)

Although you may feel under pressure in a solving event if you’re competitively minded it’s still possible to enjoy ‘lightbulb moments’ when you spot a nice paradoxical key move like this. And even if, competitive-minded, you find a solving tourney as stressful as a game in the Bristol League, it’s like a League game in which you’re guaranteed that you’re going to have the opportunity to play a brilliant winning move!

If you’re interested in solving events don’t hesitate to contact me.


chriscircle

Christopher Jones

Christopher holds the Grandmaster title for Chess Problem Composition and uses his skills to write a regular column for the Bristol Chess Times. He is also a longterm Horfield Chess Club player (where he is acting secretary).